The model is a commodity
Same model, radically different outcomes. What separates them is system design, data quality, retrieval architecture and the shape of the context you hand it — not the frontier release on the label.
About
Enterprise AI Transformation Leader, WNS Global Services (now Capgemini) · Gurugram, India
I have spent fifteen years building AI inside enterprises — first the models, then the platforms around them, and now the organisations that have to live with both. The work has tracked the field: regression and churn models on telecom telemetry, NLP and entity extraction for enterprise clients, then large-scale people analytics, then GenAI, and now agentic systems in production.
Today I lead AI transformation for the commercial function of a $3.3B organisation — owning architecture, governance, investment decisions and the adoption roadmap, reporting to global commercial leadership. The current work is a GTM intelligence layer: an account-signal platform that says who to pursue and when, and an agentic planning platform that says how. Before this I built a 20-person AI practice from zero at LTIMindtree and ran a ~$500K annual cost base against it.
What I keep finding is that the interesting problems are not modelling problems. They are data-boundary problems, retrieval problems, governance problems, and — most often — adoption problems. I write here about that half of the job, because it is the half that decides whether anything reaches production.
How I think
Not a philosophy. Just the patterns that have held up across enough organisations, and enough generations of the technology, to trust.
Same model, radically different outcomes. What separates them is system design, data quality, retrieval architecture and the shape of the context you hand it — not the frontier release on the label.
Data boundaries, DLP, PII handling and responsible-AI review are cheap to design in and expensive to retrofit. In regulated environments they are also the difference between a pilot and something that ships.
A platform nobody opens has delivered nothing. Most resistance is rational — people burned by earlier tools, missing access, misaligned incentives — and each of those needs a different intervention.
Selected work
Systems that reached production and stayed there, rather than proofs of concept. Client detail withheld where it should be.
WNS / Capgemini
Account intelligence built on open data: 10-K and 8-K filings, earnings calls, Yahoo Finance and Google News, executive movement, hiring and funding signals — combined into a composite buyer-intent score for pipeline prioritisation across BFSI, Healthcare and other verticals. Replaced a $4,000/year commercial subscription.
WNS / Capgemini
Production agentic platform turning CRM records, account signals, internal proof points and an enterprise knowledge base into a pursuit-ready plan in under ten minutes rather than two to three hours. It closes the loop: signal, priority, plan, pursuit.
WNS / Capgemini
LLM-powered pursuit system for $20M–$100M RFP cycles — pre-RFP strategy, win themes, executive briefings, SME mobilisation, orals prep and post-meeting iteration. Source-grounded and human-gated throughout.
LTIMindtree
Two-way agentic matching across 100,000 users at 90% accuracy, with 90,000 structured skill profiles created behind it. Replaced a ~$200K annual vendor licence and, unlike it, could explain every match it made.
LTIMindtree
The organisation’s first production GenAI, in 2023: a Sales Proposal Bot (~40% less RFP preparation effort), an HR Policy Q&A Bot (~35% lower helpdesk load) and a Cybersecurity Risk & Control Bot. Standards co-developed with Microsoft product teams.
LTIMindtree
Joining propensity, a three-layer explainable attrition predictor built to be usable by HR business partners, employee-project matching on Azure ML with NLP embeddings at 90% accuracy, and salary forecasting.
Background
The short version. The longer one is on LinkedIn.
WNS Global Services (now Capgemini) · Gurugram
AI strategy and portfolio for the commercial function of a $3.3B organisation — architecture, governance and investment decisions, reporting to global commercial leadership. Built the GTM intelligence layer: a proprietary account-signal platform and a production account-planning agent, now serving 300+ users across a $570M+ deal portfolio.
LTIMindtree · Bengaluru
Built and led a 20-person AI/ML practice from zero inside the CIO organisation, owning a ~$500K annual cost base. Shipped the organisation’s first production GenAI solutions in 2023, and a 100,000-user AI talent marketplace that replaced a ~$200K black-box vendor licence with an explainable in-house platform.
Dell Technologies · Bengaluru
Predictive analytics across TB+ consumer datasets, end to end from data sourcing through production integration — a 20% operational efficiency improvement.
Tata Consultancy Services · Bengaluru
Led a three-person team on NLP text classification and entity extraction for enterprise clients across the US, UK and Asia — 30% improvement in reporting accuracy.
Ericsson · Gurugram
Regression, classification and churn models for telecom network performance analytics, and the Python pipelines behind them, for clients in the USA and South Africa.
Saburi TLC · Axon Network Solutions · ASMA Financial Solutions
Churn prediction, customer segmentation, demand forecasting and revenue analytics across telecom, networking and financial services — where the Python, SQL and statistical foundations were laid.
Credentials
Tools change every eighteen months. These are the ones currently in hand.
Technical stack
I am glad to hear from AI and engineering leaders, founders, and anyone who disagrees with something I have written here.